After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies are now reviving these systems. Right from lie detection tools examined at the line to a system for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being utilized for asylum applications. This article explores how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with capricious tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to navigate these devices and to pursue their legal right for security.

It also displays how these kinds of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from being able to view the channels of safety. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of technologies, in which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects whom are disciplined by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article argues that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double impact: while they assist to expedite the asylum procedure, they also make it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions created by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.